I never said it does not hold importance, I am just trying to understand your view point.
[ There is a lull in her response. ]
Back in my world, I was a diplomat. I've been around many people like you and the case you're speaking of is very different compared to the killing involved with war. The matter of personal survival versus the survival of larger groups hold different outcomes and, if it were possible, it would be easier to be rid of both in relational terms between countries. I am not a fool to think that world peace will ever fully and completely exist, but it's still not a lost hope to try and alleviate those messes with words and compromises instead.
If you were meant to battle without having to protect other enclosures, as well as out own, would you still do it? Would it still matter to you if there were not more lives endangered?
written
[ There is a lull in her response. ]
Back in my world, I was a diplomat. I've been around many people like you and the case you're speaking of is very different compared to the killing involved with war. The matter of personal survival versus the survival of larger groups hold different outcomes and, if it were possible, it would be easier to be rid of both in relational terms between countries. I am not a fool to think that world peace will ever fully and completely exist, but it's still not a lost hope to try and alleviate those messes with words and compromises instead.
If you were meant to battle without having to protect other enclosures, as well as out own, would you still do it? Would it still matter to you if there were not more lives endangered?